This Tuesday Mr. Litman gave us a paper with some information about what’s going on with the secondary students from state schools. They are doing some strikes and riots to be heard. Their aim is to pay more attention to the LGE (General Education Law) and that this one shouldn’t be passed by the parliament. We talked about these issues, which are very important for us as future teachers, and discussed the ideology of this whole situation. The majority of us said that it would be impossible to change the quality of education now. Students fight for justice and equality but inequality is going to be always around the corner.
Anyway, it was a very interesting topic to be discussed with the class. We shared our opinions in group work and then with the whole class.
The second part of the class was in the laboratory, where we looked up for some interesting new in the Monday’s newspaper. La tercera.cl offers a multimedia version that can be seen online. The entire newspaper is there for you to read it.
We read an interesting article about new strategies for parents to keep track of their children at the schools. Parents are able now to look up for grades, behaviour and even if their children are missing a class. They can know immediately if their children are lying. They can search for that information on the web and find out if their children are telling the truth about their grades or not. Some web pages have more users but there are a lot of these. In
There are some “rebellions” against these web pages. Another web page; facebook, has shown some groups that are against these programs and web pages that their parents are using. Boys and girls show their emotions and share their opinions about this on facebook, where everyday more adepts join these groups.
This Tuesday was the presentation of Paula, Marlen and Ma Teresa. Their topic was “Troubled adolescents at school”.
They presented the topic very clearly. They talked about what a troubled adolescent is; some behaviour problems in children, changes caused by poverty, the influence of society and attraction to bad behaviour, among other things.
They presented some risk factors like violence, alcohol and suicide, introduced the acronym of ADHO (Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) which means and special issue of troubled teens, and talked about some special schools that help troubled teenagers such as military schools, boarding schools, and disciplinary camps.
Their presentation was very good. A little bit fast but good. Their activity was very nice. We had to share our opinions in two different cases as a teacher. They didn’t move around that much, though, only when we were discussing the cases. The handout where the cases were had some grammatical and syntax problems, just a few of them. Anyway, they did a good job.
After that presentation we went to the laboratory to know what the page www.educarchile.cl was about.
This Monday was the presentation of Katherine and Nadia. They
presented the topic of bullying in schools and they made it differently. 2 groups already presented the topic but these girls gave us new information. They started the micro lesson with a glossary hand out. The vocabulary turned out to be a little bit difficult and unfamiliar but at the end they explained very clear everything about the topic. They made us read some paragraphs from the power point and answer some questions such as “What do you think this is about?” after reading a paragraph or a headline.
The activity was quite good too. They made us share some opinions and talk to the class about our points of view.
They didn’t move around, though. Body language was an important issue that they forgot. I think they need to improve that. Everything else was very good.
That same class Mr. Litman showed us the “life” video again. This time we needed to pay attention to the details. We talked to our classmates and discussed the philosophy, the ideas and the background music. The leader of every group shared the different opinions and everybody listened.
Last Monday Daniela and Evelyn talked about Classroom management. Even though I arrived late (I’m so sorry) I was able to get involved in the presentation. They looked confident in what they said but I think that Daniela looked a little bit nervous. I know that they were worried about the time and that is something that always keeps our minds busy when we are in the middle of a presentation. About the activity part I don’t know what happened. I think it was the same thing; time. I also think they did a good job but they showed a lack of movement and body language. This has been a topic that everybody in the class needs to develop in a higher level. All the previous presentation have presented the same problem, (besides the last part of activities that presents the same problem: weakness) until this Tuesday.
This Tuesday Rodrigo, Felipe and Fernanda presented the topic of Leadership and it was one hell of a presentation! It was a real micro lesson. That was how it was supposed to be since the beginning of the presentations. I’m not saying this because they are my friends; I’m saying it because I feel that way.
They presented the topic and made has involve during the presentation by reading paragraphs, answering questions and giving opinions. They used the whiteboard (a tool that we should use more) and they moved around the classroom. They were very clear. The activity part was fun. They made us talk a lot, and besides the activity they had a little discussion that was also fun. At the end of the micro lesson they gave us a handout very useful to identify a leader from an administrator. Good for them. Nice job.
That same day, before the micro lesson, Mr. Litman and we (the class) talked about opinions and about the class in general. It’s true that we don’t take advantage of the talking time that Mr. Litman gives us. We should be talking more and present our points of view more often. He said that he doesn’t want to be talking all the time and that we should go ahead and talk, without paying attention to our fears. Maybe because we are shy or insecure we don’t speak enough. I believe that we are learning from our mistakes and that we should make more to improve our English. Otherwise, how can we learn if we don’t make mistakes? At the end one suggestion was made: add a debate at the end of every micro lesson, make the classmates share their opinions and talk more. I think this is a great idea as long as it works in the way it’s supposed to.
Claudio, Pedro and Fabián talked about bullying inside the class and other kinds of bullying outside the class, like using the mass media for bullying.
They started with the definition and the causes, mentioning the school reality of these days and the importance of family in children’s values.
They talked about what to do if your child is the victim or the aggressor, the parents’ role and the values against violence and injustice, which are very important in children’s education.
They showed a video with students punching and kicking other students. This video presented some bullying examples that are part of daily life in some schools around the world.
They end with consequences such as psychological problems in the victims or changes in the whole life of these boys. Some examples were shown also. I remember the case of a young girl who committed suicide because of being bulled by her classmates. What a sad story.
The same problem with the previous presentations; a very good and interesting presentation but no preoccupation on the activities. I think we all forgot that it was a micro lesson and not only a presentation. I accept though, the fact that the clock was on them. They had no time for activities.
Dreny, Nicole and Katherine talked about how we should be in front of a
class, how we could improve what we already know but don’t practice and how we should behave with students correctly.
They mentioned the different kind of teachers. Among them we can find involver, diagnostician, etc.
They made a good presentation with a very interesting video about the story of a teacher and her prejudices about a boy with no interest in class. The ending of the story was really emotive. It was a sad story but with a happy ending.
The only thing they forgot was the participation of the class in a higher level. They had the same problem that my group and I had. We paid more attention to the presentation than the class itself.
Yesterday, Mr. Litman talked about our presentations. After every presentation he reviewed the power point with us to learn from our mistakes. We realized of grammatical and spelling mistakes and methodological mistakes that we usually make.
He showed us a short video called “Life”. In this video we can see a small guy coming down through some stairs and sits down on a chair. In front of him there’s a table with a phone on it. This phone has 6 numbers only. The guy press number 1 and we can see something like “the election of a planet from a galaxy”. Then press number 2, and the planet receives a zoom in. Number 3 shows us nature, number 4 animals, numbers 5 people and number 6 buildings, cities. All of these things appeared on the planet but this guy realizes that there’s more. With a pair of binoculars he can see people fighting each other, violence, crimes, desperation and chaos. On the phone we can see the option of deleting, so this guy presses the delete button and the planet is deleted. This is a consequence of what he did.
He realizes that the construction of a planet always ends in the same way. He might wonder why violence and crime is always a consequence of civilization. He doesn’t know that is part of life. This is how we live today; in a world with no peace. That was many years ago. Now everybody gets corrupted easily. Violence and crime are right around the corner and to change that we are going to need so many years of education and evolution. Maybe. I think we haven’t evolved yet.
